Atlantic Capital Management

Atlantic Capital Management (84)

Wednesday, 17 December 2014 00:00

Keeping Holiday Spending Under Control

Written by

What little steps can you take to keep from getting carried away?

You’ve seen the footage on the news. You’ve been in the middle of it. You’ve stood in the vexing lines. You’ve circled for the elusive parking spots. Holiday shopping can be downright frenzied – and impulsive.

You don’t necessarily need to go to the mall to feel the pressure and the urges – a half-hour with your laptop or tablet can put you in the same frame of mind.

But how do you keep your spending under control, whether in a brick and mortar store or at home? Here are some tips.

Make a plan. Most people do their holiday shopping without one. Set a dollar limit that you can spend per week – and try to spend less than that. As you plan your financial life – and check on your plan every few days – you may feel a little less stressed this holiday season. In fact, you might want to make two budgets – one for shopping, the other for entertaining.

Recognize the hidden costs. Holiday shopping isn’t just a matter of price tags. When you don’t visit brick-and-mortar retailers, you don’t eat at the food court or coffee shop and you don’t spend money for gas. Carpooling to the mall or taking public transit can help you save some cash.

On the other hand, when you shop online, there’s always shipping to consider. It can make what is seemingly a bargain less so. Free or discounted shipping feels like you’re getting a gift.  Online retailers can also be very finicky about returns. Miss a deadline to return something to an online retailer (who hasn’t?) and you may end up paying sizable return fees or just getting stuck with what you purchased. 

Counteract those holiday expenses elsewhere in your budget. Maybe you spent a couple hundred more than you anticipated on that flat-screen. To offset that extra spending, pinpoint some areas where you can save elsewhere in your budget. Could you find cheaper auto insurance? Could you eat in more this month? Could you drive less or cancel that gym membership or premium cable subscription?  

If you do go overboard, strategize to attack that excess debt. You may want to pay off the smallest debt first, then the next smallest and so forth onto the largest. That’s the debt snowball approach advocated by Dave Ramsey. Or you may want to take the debt stacking approach favored by Suze Orman, whereby you pay down the debt with the highest interest rate first, then the one with the second highest interest rate, and so on. 

With the latter method, you can potentially realize greater savings on interest charges, but you lose the accomplishment of quickly erasing a debt. In the debt snowball strategy, you make minimum payments on all your debts (just as in the debt stacking approach), but you devote all your extra cash to the debt with the smallest balance. The upside there is the psychological high of (quickly) paying off a debt; the downside is the lingering, larger interest charges that come with the larger debts.

If you aren’t vigilant, the holiday season could leave you with a “debt hangover,” or contribute to a severe debt load you may be burdened with. According to the Federal Reserve, the average indebted U.S. household suffered with $15,593 in credit card debt in August. That was a 2.36% increase from a year before.1 

If you feel like indulging yourself, indulge sensibly. Some people do give themselves holiday gifts, and the same logic applies – whether it is a meal, a motorcycle, or a spa package, don’t break the bank with it.

Lastly, think about setting aside some “holiday money” for 2015. If your finances allow, how about putting $100 or $200 aside for next season? Invested in interest-bearing accounts (or elsewhere), that sum could even grow larger. 


This material was prepared by MarketingPro, Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. This information has been derived from sources believed to be accurate. Please note - investing involves risk, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty. This is neither a solicitation nor recommendation to purchase or sell any investment or insurance product or service, and should not be relied upon as such. All indices are unmanaged and are not illustrative of any particular investment.



1 - [11/26/14]

If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, perhaps the same could be said about many of today’s 401K plans.  Employers craft benefit packages with the best of intentions, yet, there’s a good chance you may be administering or participating in a retirement plan not in compliance with new Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulations.  Last year nearly 75% of plans audited by the Department of Labor (DOL) were either fined, received penalties or had to make reimbursements for errors.  If your 401K plan were audited today, would it pass muster?  Or, would your company face steep fines and possible criminal indictment?

Every employer, also called the plan sponsor, needs a thorough review of their 401K plan to reduce any chances of unnecessary litigation, keep unscrupulous financial services firms out of participants’ pocketbooks, and be up-to-date with current regulations.   It is advisable for plan sponsors; particularly those with small plans, (defined as plans with less than 100 participants) to have their 401K professionally benchmarked to reveal any hidden fees, expenses, and liabilities within it.  Small plans may carry fees as high as 3% per year.  According to, over a participant’s lifetime, these fees can rob investors of nearly 35% of their total returns.  Should financial advisors, who put up no capital and take no risks, take over 1/3 of participants’ returns when they put up all of the capital and take on all of the risk?

We don’t think so.  If your company’s 401K plan hasn’t been audited by the government yet, you won’t have to wait long—the DOL brought on nearly 1000 new hires.  Their role is to enforce ERISA rules by serving as watchdogs and issuing government fines (or worse) to offending employers.  An estimated 88 individuals, including: plan officials, corporate officers, and service providers were criminally indicted for offenses related to their benefit plans, according to the DOL.  It’s important to note plan sponsors (that’s every employer!) will assume fiduciary responsibility.  When the government’s rules are not met, substantial fines can accrue.  Last year’s average, as reported by the DOL, was $600,000 per plan—an increase of almost $150K in the past 4 years alone.

So how did this all start—and how did it spin out of control?  The 401K was first created in the late 1970’s as the U.S. government tried to limit the amount of cash-deferred compensation plans being offered.  An enterprising business consultant to Johnson & Johnson discovered a loop hole which allowed highly compensated executives and their employees to save more of their pre-tax dollars for retirement. And the 401K was born.  Today’s plans can be relatively complex, however, the original plans were straightforward and offered only two investment options: a guaranteed fund and a single equity mutual fund.  As executives wanted to add more flavors to the menu, these options got more complicated; two options became fifteen; which in turn became thousands.  As the menu of investment options grew, an opportunity for middlemen to get involved at the expense of the American worker through layer upon layer of fees presented itself.  Institutions offering small plans, largely brokerage firms and insurance companies, knew that plan sponsors would be unlikely to realize their plan participants were bearing unnecessary expenses or that enterprising salesmen had created revenue streams in excess of their annual advisory fee by selecting investment options laden with upfront sales charges, mark-ups, and recurring fees.

Fast-forward to last year when EBSA released a final rule for increased transparency about fees in 401K plans.  While the news didn’t receive much fanfare, ERISA mandates state that fees paid both at the participant level and the plan level be “usual and customary” for what the market dictates.  If your plan was compliant five years ago, it’s not necessarily compliant today; there is a high likelihood it isn’t.  Robert Hiltonsmith’s research in The Retirement Drain: The Hidden and Excessive Costs of 401(k)s, showed excess fees robbing investors of as much as 33% of their returns.  According to a recent piece in Fortune, excessive fees accumulated over 30 years can erode as much as 37% of returns.  Demos, a New York-based think tank, concluded that an ordinary American household will spend nearly $155K in 401(K) fees over their lifetime.

If you are an employer offering a 401K plan, it is unlikely you chose it with the intention of robbing plan participants of their retirement money or putting yourself in the proverbial hot seat by unintentionally breaking the law.  So what do you need to do today to pass muster with the U.S. Government – especially if it has not been reviewed since the new rules took effect last August?  First and foremost, hire a professional to benchmark your 401K plan.  We also recommend:

Build a 404(c) compliant line-up which provides a variety of investment options. 404c compliance allows you, the plan sponsor, to shift responsibility for investment results to plan participants.  Provided your plan allows employees to choose from a menu of varied investment choices, it’s vital that your menu is 404(c) compliant.  Essentially, what this does is relieve your plan fiduciary of the liability arising from your participants individual investment decisions.  Consider a fund line-up that consists of a broad group of low cost passively managed index funds, with little overlap,  that give employees access to multiple asset classes.

Hire a co-fiduciary. As a plan sponsor you have a duty to act in the best interest of your participants.  This means that you need to be a prudent expert.  If you are not, you need to go out and find that expertise. We believe that it’s not only intelligent for that advisor to be a fiduciary, IT IS IMPERATIVE.  The firm that you choose to put your plan together, must share in your risk, not profit from it.  So rather than working with a broker, who may be compensated by steering the plan sponsor towards funds that increase the sponsor’s risks, yet pay the broker a higher commission, we strongly suggest your investment advisor serve as a fiduciary, choosing the investment choices that are best for your employees and the plan sponsor.

Provide participants with education and support.
Any retirement plan provider should provide the plan sponsor with comprehensive enrollment materials, educational content, a website with interactive tools, and access to an investment advisor that participants can access for one-on-one support in order to make better financial decisions.  Educated participants are less likely to make uninformed decisions, and, not offering educational information sessions could put employers at risk.  The investment advisor should also conduct a risk tolerance review with each plan participant.

Adopt a formal, written investment policy. ERISA Section 402(b)(1) requires retirement plans to provide a “procedure for establishing and carting out a funding policy and method consistent with the objectives of the plan.” A formal investment policy identifies: a) the investment goals and objectives of the plan; b) sets the decision-making process for structuring the overall make-up of the portfolio and selecting investments; and c) specifies the measuring tools for ongoing performance assessment. The investment policy should focus on how investment decisions are made, rather than the investments themselves. Adhering to ERISA Section 404(c) guidelines with a formal, written investment policy provides plan sponsors added protection.

Be wary of the “No Cost” plan.  Many group annuity insurance firms understand businesses don’t want to pay anything when beginning a 401K for participants, so, they offer to charge a wrap fee as an alternative.  It essentially marks up the cost of the underlying investments by as much as 1-1.5% per year.  The firms that do this know this fee isn’t enough to cover their administrative and recordkeeping expenses for your plan upfront.  However, after 5 years, when there’s a $2-3M payroll, they know it’s unlikely their rates will be renegotiated.  So plan sponsors continue paying excess fees which line the pockets of plan administrators and their brokers. Reuters recently wrote about one such lawsuit involving Mass Mutual.  The best way to avoid such headaches is to know what you are getting into from the get go; professional benchmarking is valuable here.

Consider adding options to allow contributors to increase annual tax deductible retirement contributions beyond the statutory $17,500 annual pre-tax contribution limits.

A Profit Sharing Plan will enable higher income earners to save as much as $50,000 per year for retirement through tax deferred contributions.

A Defined Benefit Plan, on top of this, may enable some participants to save $200,000 per year in pre-tax contributions.At 5% in annual appreciation, a plan participant would have accumulated over $2M in additional tax deferred savings, assuming only $50,000 in annual pre-tax contributions.

Just because your plan was compliant 5 years ago doesn’t mean it is today.  Prudent plan sponsors will have an independent 3rd party benchmark their plan at least once per year.  Today’s new rules, as well as the DOL’s attention on small businesses, could mean more employers in the hot seat.  Don’t be punished for your good deeds!  Be clear as to what burdens in your 401K plan lie on you—and what do not.

The information contained in this article is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. The Abernathy Group II does not hold itself out as a legal or tax adviser. If you wish to receive a legal opinion or tax advice on the matter(s) in this report please contact our offices and we will refer you to an appropriate legal practitioner.

Our Blog


(15 articles)


(24 articles)


(15 articles)


(18 articles)


(12 articles)


(3 articles)